(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

This is version . It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited.
[Back to current version]   [Restore this version]

I seems reasonable to provide at least one method of emphasis of either kind -- one for highlighting words and phrases, and one for just distinguishing them.

The actual PresentationDependsOnStyle of the page, but the markup should at least try to reflect the most common looks, in order to make it MostlyWysiwyg.

Common methods of emphasis:

Not highlighting:

  • italic text
  • slanted text
  • sans serif font
  • monospace font
  • small caps


  • bold text
  • underline
  • text color
  • background color
  • bullets or other marks
  • larger/smaller type
  • letter spacing

Note that some of those techniques are generally frowned upon, as they hinder readability. Especially monospace font, letter spacing and varying type size will be hard to read, as they change the letter spacing and thus cheat our sense of "word length". Colored and/or underlined text can be confused with links, so should be only used for them.

Although italics and underline fall into different categories above, there is a tradition in typography that says http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/HTML/Information/Punctuation/italicsunderline.html:


Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

« This particular version was published on 07-Nov-2006 14:51 by RadomirDopieralski.