(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

 
View Attach Info

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

This page (revision-2) was last changed on 16-May-2008 13:55 by Isonomia  

This page was created on 16-May-2008 13:50 by Isonomia

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Difference between version and

At line 2 added one line
Having just removed some links from a page, and knowing the real hassle spamcauses everyone, it seems **CRITICAL** that creole includes within thespecification provision to tackle spam.
At line 3 changed one line
Having just removed some links from a page, and knowing the real hassle spam causes everyone, it seems **CRITICAL** that creole includes within the specification provision to tackle spam.
That is to say, the problem of spam should be dealt with at thespecification stage and so integrated into the spec, rather than trying to bebolted on at a later stage.
At line 5 changed 7 lines
That is to say, the problem of spam should be dealt with at the specification stage and so integrated into the spec, rather than trying to be bolted on at a later stage.
There are two main reasons (??) for spam:
# Creating links to boost the profile of sites in search engines.
# As a form of virtual grafetti
There are two main reasons (??) for spam:
#Creating links to boost the profile of sites in search engines.
#As a form of virtual graffiti
At line 13 removed one line
The specification should not say: {{{[[http://ripuoff.con|Hot chicks]]}}} **will** create a link, but should say **may** create a link so that sites which decide not to allow links or some links, may say they are creole compliant.
At line 15 changed one line
The specification should imly that the default format for a link is with the {{{rel="nofollow"}}} Action included.
The specification should not say: {{{[[http://ripUoff.con|Hotchicks]]}}} **will** create a link, but should say **may** create alink so that sites which decide not to allow links or some links, may say they are creole compliant.
At line 17 changed one line
That is to say the Creole specification should say that a Creole compliant wiki will ahve the nofollow action on all publicly/anonymous postable forums.
But, the specification **should say** that the default format for a link is with the **rel="nofollow"** Action included.
At line 19 changed 3 lines
This will mean that rather than making it easier for spam to post to wikis, that the creole specification will mean that sites can only remove the nofollow action where they take additional steps to prevent spam. This will protect everyone.
==Grafetti spam==
That is to say the Creole specification should say that a Creole compliantwiki will have the nofollow action on all publicly/anonymous postable forums. This will mean that rather than making it easier for spam to post to wikis,that the creole specification will mean that sites can only remove the nofollow action where they take additional steps to prevent spam. This will protecteveryone.
==Graffiti spam==
Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
2 16-May-2008 13:55 1.511 kB Isonomia to previous smelling corrections
1 16-May-2008 13:50 1.509 kB Isonomia to last Spam prevention needs to be inbuilt to specification
« This page (revision-2) was last changed on 16-Mai-2008 13:55 by Isonomia