(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

 
View Attach Info

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

This page (revision-7) was last changed on 05-May-2007 13:29 by ChristophSauer  

This page was created on 07-Feb-2007 10:24 by ChristophSauer

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Difference between version and

At line 3 changed one line
== 2007-01-09
== 2006-09-23
RadomirDopieralski: We are making some progress, and receiving some feedback, but it seems to be pretty disorganized. In particular, it's hard to find rationales and explanations behind the decissions, as well as proper discussions on alternatives. I'm afraid that we will end up with some markup format, and not much more.
At line 5 changed one line
RadomirDopieralski: I did a little cleanup, moved parts of discussions into relevant "proposal" pages and apropriate talk pages. I hope this will help to keep things in order. I also linked from the [[Versions]] page to the proposals discussed for particular version. Should we also refactor the discussions into "rationale" descriptions on the [[Elements]] pages? They have grown to sizes impossible to catch up to for new readers.
That's why I'd like to start creating some [[GoodPractices]] descriptions related to creating markup language for wikis in particular, and (maybe) text markup languages in general.
If each new proposition, recommendation, good practice, etc. is on a separate page, then it's easier to document it's pros and cons, interactions with other parts, discussion.
I'm not sure if this wiki is a good place to do it, but we can try. I'm a little afraid of clashes with existing pages on this wiki, and of "hijacking recent changes" -- after all it would be nice to just look at RC here and see what's new in the draft.
What do you people think? Would you be interested in such a wiki? Maybe somehting like this already exists?
ChristophSauer: Good Idea. I think this wiki would be a good place to put it, and actually Ward also mentioned this idea of BestPractices. If we have more implementations I would like to set up a student research project that would test the usability of creole in non technical faculties. They then could use and extend those GoodPractices for creole. Let's keep it here and see how it works out. Let's keep the efforts focused on one wiki for now. I would not be too afraid of hijacking RC. If people are interested in a particular set of pages, for example how the standard is evolving, they can use the individual RSS feeds of every page to compile their own RC through their blogreader.
== 2007-04-04
I like pie, but I'm a little concerned about the sampling of wiki engines used to make those charts. I noticed that every chart uses a different set of wiki engines to compare against -- what are the rules of choosing them? Shouldn't the sample set be uniform?
I started making the [[No Wiki Markup Comparison]] and I understand perfectly how hard it is to collect information about markup on wikis -- that's why I'm listing the engines that are on [[WikiMatrix]], but that I failed to collect information about (they lack documentation, their site is down or otherwise unusable, they only use a WYSIWYG editor).
I **know** that the collected statistics are not biased on purpose and that it's technical and/or organisational difficulties that rule the choice of engines, but at the same time I think we should play it safe and don't lie when we don't have full info.
-- [[Radomir Dopieralski]], 2007-Apr-04
Thanks Radomir. Yes, the charts should be uniform. And if it is impossible for some reason (e.g. because some engines don't support some markup) there should be at least an explanation why the charts are not uniform. Chuck, could you add this please?
-- [[Christoph Sauer]], 2007-Apr-10
Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
7 05-May-2007 13:29 3.017 kB ChristophSauer to previous moved to proposals
6 05-May-2007 13:28 3.81 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last added link to generic extension element proposal
5 05-May-2007 13:27 3.827 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last added link to generic extension element proposal
4 21-Apr-2007 15:27 3.732 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last moved from talk to here.
3 27-Feb-2007 19:38 2.503 kB null to previous | to last added comment regarding image/download syntax
2 07-Feb-2007 10:25 1.788 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last moved from Talk
1 07-Feb-2007 10:24 0.473 kB ChristophSauer to last moved from Talk
« This page (revision-7) was last changed on 05-Mai-2007 13:29 by ChristophSauer