(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

 

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

This page (revision-4) was last changed on 29-Sep-2008 19:49 by JohnMcClure  

This page was created on 23-Sep-2008 21:15 by JohnMcClure

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Difference between version and

At line 8 changed one line
----
At line 12 added 21 lines
----
1. What do you mean by "group"?
2. No, there are lots of people with lots of ideas, although it's been quiet lately. The huge amount of possible ideas is (was) one problem of this project, actually.
3. It's not really possible to discuss usability- and user experience-related topics without at least minimal testing. Building and testing prototypes should be in my opinion an important part of the design process, especially with new things.
-- [[RadomirDopieralski]], 2008-Sep-26
----
1. I saw "begin a group" button somewhere on this site; I'm not sure what that is about.
\\2. My hope is to see palpable interest in crafting Creole 2.0 now that 1.0 is published. It's difficult to discern whether or not the group has implicitly concurred that its work goals have been substantially reached. There is precious little talk about 2.0 on this site. 18 months ago the question was broached but not answered:
{{{
The 1.0 specification explicitely says "frozen" and
"no development for two years". And ultimately, there
couldn't be any - after full two years of no-moving.
So if there's no chance for a 1.5 or ever seeing a
Creole 2.0, won't Wiki markups drift apart again sooner
or later? I'm uncertain that Creole additions are going
to cut it.
-- Mario, 2007-Jul-11
}}}
3. Agreed that useability is a key issue, as is technical feasibility; the evaluation and design processes should address these. Your process has been based so far on comparing syntaxes across engines for common requirements and design so yes, a discussion of the process for crafting & validating prospective syntax would be in order.
\\ -- [[JohnMcClure]] 2008 Sep 29
----
Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
4 29-Sep-2008 19:49 2.406 kB JohnMcClure to previous Response to RadomirD
3 26-Sep-2008 19:47 1.21 kB RadomirDopieralski to previous | to last my attempt at answering the questions
2 24-Sep-2008 11:52 0.722 kB YvesPiguet to previous | to last ack
1 23-Sep-2008 21:15 0.431 kB JohnMcClure to last Three questions
« This page (revision-4) was last changed on 29-Sep-2008 19:49 by JohnMcClure