(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

 
View Attach Info

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

This page (revision-105) was last changed on 02-Apr-2008 10:50 by ChristophSauer  

This page was created on 25-Mar-2007 14:22 by 222.46.18.34

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Difference between version and

At line 1 added 4 lines
<<ALLOW edit Admin>>
<<ALLOW view All>>
[[UnlockMe]]
At line 320 added 35 lines
Some replies:
* XHTML for monospace: all XHTML snippets are for illustration only, to make the Creole markup description clearer. They shouldn't be considered as recommendations. I suggest to add a note to that effect in the next revision of Creole. Why some of us consider useful to separate inline nowiki from monospace has already been discussed elsewhere.
* Definition lists: the current addition is in agreement with mediawiki. Constraining too much the Creole syntax for aesthetics reasons has been rejected in other cases such as lists. Multiple definition paragraphs are fine.
-- [[YvesPiguet]], 2008-Feb-29
Allowing unnecessary flexibility where it is not really used leads to monsters like the arcane list rules.
-- [[RadomirDopieralski]]
Ok, I'm not against discussing definition lists. But I assumed implementers could pick additions which suited them. If additions are changed by newcomers after having been implemented and used by early adopters, we can as well ignore them entirely.
[[Nyctergatis|NME]] implements all current additions but alternate link syntax, and that's going to stay.
-- [[YvesPiguet]], 2008-Mar-2
That's the risk of early adopters, isn't it?
I also don't like "ad hominem" arguments like this (about newcomers)-- let us judge the value of ideas by how well they suit Creole goals and how well argumented and documented they are, not by who submits them.
-- [[RadomirDopieralski]], 2008-Mar-05
I didn't want to offend anybody and I apologize if I did. I'm glad if new visitors come, discuss, contribute to and improve Creole and its adoption. What made me react was changes made without prior discussion to a page which serves as the reference for features implemented in several engines, not only mine.
-- [[YvesPiguet]], 2008-Mar-5
I know you didn't mean to offend, sorry for overreacting. Maybe there should be a separate CreoleAdditionsSpecDraft page, so that we can work on the addtions here? Or even better, one page per addition, for example the *Proposal pages? Maybe we should even
version them?
The "talk" link is not visible for new visitors, and one of the wiki rules is "be bold" - so please don't be annoyed.
As a side note, forcing a "discussion" (or, in wiki jargon, "thread mode") is a very clunky way of working on a document and kind of defeats the whole idea of a wiki. I know that wikipedia somehow manages to work this way, but it's hard for me. It was disturbing me from the start (although I wasn't really aware of it). Of course, I'm not going to start to pressure for a change, but I'm curious about experiences and thoughts of others in this.
--[[RadomirDopieralski]], 2008-Mar-6
Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
105 02-Apr-2008 10:50 19.726 kB ChristophSauer to previous restored locked version
104 02-Apr-2008 10:01 0.06 kB 86.96.226.14 to previous | to last
103 02-Apr-2008 08:50 19.668 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last unlocked
102 13-Mar-2008 09:36 19.726 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last
101 13-Mar-2008 09:36 19.704 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last
« This page (revision-105) was last changed on 02-Apr-2008 10:50 by ChristophSauer