(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

 

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

This page (revision-46) was last changed on 05-Oct-2008 17:38 by 69.243.201.36  

This page was created on 04-Sep-2006 01:57 by 217.162.145.188

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Difference between version and

At line 56 changed one line
I'm also used to do . Maybe it's a habit from html, or from the wiki engines I use most. Anyways, if you don't want to break your train of thought, the put the link text only, and then insert the links when you finish the article. I found this way the most comfortable. Or just use.
I'm also used to do {{{ [ url | text ] }}}. Maybe it's a habit from html, or from the wiki engines I use most. Anyways, if you don't want to break your train of thought, the put the link text only, and then insert the links when you finish the article. I found this way the most comfortable. Or just use [local names|http://ln.taoriver.net/about.html].
At line 59 added 21 lines
I also lik the desription first notation, because it's much easier to read and understand. You first get what it's about and then the technical details (url/page/etc.). I also what to submit another syntax based on this. Please use the symbol greater then (>) instead of the pipe. First because it makes the order clearer.
{{{
[[this description is linked to>this page]]
}}}
Second because it is easier to use links with description in tables (if supported) without having to escape the pipe, as it is necessary in some engines. I think it could also be easier to implement then.
{{{
|a table |with [[a link>to a page]] |and other |cells
}}}
It's also easier to read then.
-- [JörgGottschling], 2006-16-06
I'm against the introduction of such new markup.
I also think that the wording "Links should not be allowed to contain a linebreak" should be changed. What's the benefit of not allowing it? I see a benefit in not requiring this feature, but forbidding this features is useless crippling. I'm not planning on removing this features from my implementation, for example.
-- AlexSchroeder
Linebreak restriction removed from [Creole 0.3].
--[Chuck Smith]
Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
46 05-Oct-2008 17:38 4.08 kB 69.243.201.36 to previous
45 25-Mar-2008 08:16 3.983 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last respond to Carl
44 25-Mar-2008 05:04 3.85 kB CarlCravens to previous | to last
43 16-Oct-2007 10:01 3.022 kB ChristophSauer to previous | to last moved from talk
42 26-Sep-2007 09:06 2.114 kB ChuckSmith to previous | to last restore
41 26-Sep-2007 00:57 2.124 kB 219.138.204.162 to previous | to last
« This page (revision-46) was last changed on 05-Okt-2008 17:38 by 69.243.201.36