(anonymous guest) (logged out)

Copyright (C) by the contributors. Some rights reserved, license BY-SA.

Sponsored by the Wiki Symposium and the Nuveon GmbH.

 

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

This page (revision-10) was last changed on 24-May-2008 10:33 by ChristophSauer  

This page was created on 05-Feb-2007 18:02 by 142.177.76.130

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Difference between version and

At line 11 changed one line
The use of proposed priority order is very common in wikis especially for votes. As there are many ways to undermine a vote it would be useful at least to allow for a list style that automatically re-ordered or tally items based on, for instance, some ranking or vote system that acts as a plugin. No need to use new characters, an overload could do, something like {{{ #* }}} to mean "present these in the order that the group agrees on by voting" and {{{ *# }}} to mean "keep these in the order defined but indicate the tally of votes for each one beside the option" or something like that. This lets a page describing a decison or election be locked while users vote. Even if all users can edit, anyone changing that structure is not going to mess up the plugin tallying the vote, unlike a standard wiki page, because the numbers are elsewhere. Also it becomes much harder to fool naive users: any change to the structure is unjustified during a vote since the plugin does the job of ordering at HTML presentation, so you'll spot anyone mucking around easily and can lock the vote-receiving structure if required. Changing the list of option(s) would for instance invalidate the vote unless/until it was restored to a previous state. Variants could support prefernence {{{ #*# }}} and allocation {{{ *#* }}} or other types of votes.
The use of proposed priority order is very common in wikis especially for votes. As there are many ways to undermine a vote it would be useful at least to allow for a list style that automatically re-ordered or tally items based on, for instance, some ranking or vote system that acts as a plugin. No need to use new characters, an overload could do, something like {{{ #*v }}} to mean "present these in the order that the group agrees on by voting" and {{{ *#v }}} to mean "keep these in the order defined but indicate the tally of votes for each one beside the option" or something like that. This lets a page describing a decison or election be locked while users vote. Even if all users can edit, anyone changing that structure is not going to mess up the plugin tallying the vote, unlike a standard wiki page, because the numbers are elsewhere. Also it becomes much harder to fool naive users: any change to the structure is unjustified during a vote since the plugin does the job of ordering at HTML presentation, so you'll spot anyone mucking around easily and can lock the vote-receiving structure if required. Changing the list of option(s) would for instance invalidate the vote unless/until it was restored to a previous state. Variants could support preference {{{ *#p }}} and allocation {{{ *#a }}} or other types of votes. If you like, replace the v, p, a with [[slash]] or whatever you want.
At line 17 added 2 lines
Creole certainly does have an obligation to reserve characters and respect some patterns of use, like use of [[colon]]s and [[slash]]es, already established by W3 and so on.
At line 22 added one line
-- Anonymous, 2007-02-05
At line 24 added 6 lines
I don't think it is the role of Creole to encourage writing specific plugins. Personally I never ever encoutered the use cases you describe in a wild on any wiki I know.
-- RadomirDopieralski, 2007-02-05
It certainly is the role of Creole to allow for further extension and guide it by encouraging expression of specific markup problems in well standardized ways.
You cannot be seriously saying you have never seen a wiki page used to run a vote? How about "articles for deletion", objections to promotion to sysop status, etc.? Wikipedia is full of such pages. And wikis aren't being used for a lot of things right now, though they should be, because they lack the rank, vote, and survey / polling features that other social software tends to have.
At line 23 changed one line
I don't think it is the role of Creole to encourage writing specific plugins. Personally I never ever encoutered the use cases you describe in a wild on any wiki I know. Moreover, the markup you're proposing conflicts with existing Creole markup for mixed lists:
-------------------------
ARCHIVED talk, no longer relevant
At line 35 added 2 lines
Moreover, the markup you're proposing conflicts with existing Creole markup for mixed lists:
At line 42 added 12 lines
Easy enough to reconcile by adding some other character:
{{{
* first level bullet list
*# second level numbered list
*#p user ranked preference ballot ordering this second level numbered list
}}}
and if you don't like the "r" (it would only be valid to do this if spaces were required after the list mark) replace it with whatever character you want, say, a [[slash]], which already specifies a hierarchy according to W3, i.e. used in URLs.
-- Anonymous, 2007-02-05
Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
10 24-May-2008 10:33 7.898 kB ChristophSauer to previous me too
9 24-May-2008 02:15 7.301 kB 84.74.154.252 to previous | to last It turns out that I use bold words at the beginning of paragraphs quite a lot.
8 24-Mar-2007 10:19 7.1 kB YvesPiguet to previous | to last Not too fast
7 24-Mar-2007 08:42 6.983 kB 77.128.25.12 to previous | to last Please update for 0.6, please reason why no blank after bullet symbols
6 05-Feb-2007 21:21 6.582 kB RadomirDopieralski to previous | to last revert and answer
5 05-Feb-2007 19:33 5.546 kB 142.177.76.130 to previous | to last fixing syntax proposal and moving talk about it to bottom as ARCHIVED
4 05-Feb-2007 18:45 4.133 kB RadomirDopieralski to previous | to last conflicts with Creole
3 05-Feb-2007 18:12 3.763 kB 142.177.76.130 to previous | to last reserving characters causes no problems as behaviour degrades gracefully without
2 05-Feb-2007 18:07 2.06 kB RadomirDopieralski to previous | to last answer
1 05-Feb-2007 18:02 1.733 kB 142.177.76.130 to last what about presenting lists specifically for voting or ranking?
« This page (revision-10) was last changed on 24-Mai-2008 10:33 by ChristophSauer