| At line 15 added 98 lines |
|
| ---- |
|
| Thanks a lot for your help, Radomir. I worked on the problem of newlines in links and it should be fixed now. |
|
| About the parser: large part of the code is taken from Text_Wiki, so its developers are the people who deserve your compliments. But... thanks! ;) |
|
| -- [MicheleTomaiuolo], 2006-9-24 |
|
| ----- |
|
| Seems something has changed for the worse as {{{//italic **bold italic// bold**//}}} produces {{{<p><em>italic <strong>bold italic</em> bold</strong>//</p>}}}. |
|
| -- Jared Williams, 2006-09-25 |
|
| ---- |
|
| You're right, Jared, the parser is not yet so smart to avoid this kind of crossing elements. This could also involve links. Radomir, I suspect you used "View selection source" in Firefox... Is it possible? |
|
| These cases cannot be easily recognised in Text_Wiki using regular expressions. The only solution I can imagine is counting the tags (actually 'tokens' generated by previous rules) inside the body of a new found element, to avoid encapsulating a single opening or closing tag. Any suggestion? |
|
| -- [MicheleTomaiuolo], 2006-9-25 |
|
| ---- |
|
| I've added a check on the the inner tags. At least the generated XHTML is standard compliant, now, even if in convoluted texts some possible elements could be missed by the parser. |
|
| Thanks everybody for helping and finding bugs. Be patient as it's just an early release. |
|
| -- [MicheleTomaiuolo], 2006-9-25 |
|
| ---- |
|
| I'm using DOM to build the XML/XHTML, thereby ensuring the output is atleast XML compliant. Here is my current method for handling bold.. |
|
| {{{ |
| case '*': |
| if ($i < $l && $string[$i] == '*') |
| { |
| ++$i; |
| if ($parent->nodeName == 'strong') |
| $parent = $parent->parentNode; |
| else if ($parent->nodeName == 'em' |
| && $parent->parentNode->nodeName == 'strong') |
| $parent = $parent->parentNode->parentNode; |
| else |
| $parent = $parent->appendChild($doc->createElement('strong')); |
| } |
| else |
| $this->appendText($parent, '*'); |
| break; |
| }}} |
|
| So for input of {{{//italic **bold italic// bold**//}}}, it'll currently output {{{<em>italic <strong>bold italic</strong></em> bold}}}. |
|
| But I'm unsure if this should be improved upon. Perhaps the strong should be re-opened after the closing em, as in {{{<em>italic <strong>bold italic</strong></em><strong> bold</strong>}}}. |
|
| -- [JaredWilliams], 2006-9-25 |
|
| Yes, I used the 'view selection source' in firefox, shame on me, forgot it does some tidy-ing. |
|
| As for support for crossing the tags -- it's not needed. [Creole] says that this is not allowed, so the output is not defined -- of course, as it should be [NonDestructive] markup, you should display __something__, and it's nice if that something is valid (X)HTML. I think that {{{<em>italic <strong>bold italic</strong></em> bold}}} is reasonable. |
|
| -- [RadomirDopieralski], 2006-09-25 |
|
| ---- |
|
| I agree with Radomir: |
|
| * silently correcting wrong markup could encourage users' bad habits; |
| * wiki syntaxes, and Creole in particular, should use [ReadableMarkup] - so, no harm in leaving text untouched ([NonDestructive] behaviour). |
|
| I think some feedback or warning to the user would instead be useful. |
|
| -- [MicheleTomaiuolo], 2006-09-25 |
|
| I don't know why, but I cannot edit [[Engines]]... PEAR Text_Wiki_Creole is 0.4 compliant. |
|
| -- [[Michele Tomaiuolo]], 2007-02-04 |
|
| I cannot edit [[Terms]], too. Am I considered a spammer? I think I behave :) |
|
| Anyway, I cannot understand the meaning of the unified list in that page. IMO, having separated lists, for chars used by Creole and those not used, was more useful. |
|
| -- [[Michele Tomaiuolo]], 2007-02-06 |
|
| There is some bug appaearing now and then preventing the editing -- you're not considered a spammer or anything like that. |
|
| As for purpose of the list, the title says it: it's to explain the terms we use to talk about the markup. Since the terminology is not widely know or even stadarized. |
|
| Two lists could have been useful if they were up to date, and possibly linking to where the character is actually used... |
|
| -- RadomirDopieralski, 2007-02-06 |
|
| Thanks Radomir, I see. Probably we'll improve the list later, when specs will be more mature. |
| About editing, I was mostly jocking: I supposed there was something wrong about ACLs or about my profile. |
|
| -- [[Michele Tomaiuolo]], 2007-02-06 |
.